A Standard Poorly section · v0.1

PunditPoorly

Pundits in the wild — graded, ledgered, audited. Talk is cheap. We track it.

Pundits make calls. The market answers eventually. We do the bookkeeping in between — translating every meaningful public-market statement into a synthetic portfolio position, marked to market, with full audit trail.

Each card below is a pundit or pundit-cluster we've catalogued. The methodology is shared across every product: the same conviction rubric, the same deterministic portfolio engine, the same correction layer where the audience help us get attribution right. Different pundits, same receipts.

Products

All-In Podcast● live

Bestie Buys

Chamath, Sacks, Friedberg, Calacanis. Six years of calls, every receipt traceable to the episode quote.

373 episodes scored · 2020–presentOpen →
BG2 Pod (Brad Gerstner + Bill Gurley)● live

BG2 Buys

Brad's AI-infrastructure-heavy call book. Long-runway compounders that punish early harvest — Let It Ride methodology wins.

43 episodes · 64 graded calls · cross-pod with All-InOpen →
5 besties + Bill Gurley · All-In + BG2● live

Cross-Pod Holdings

The hosts-only cohort. 6 regular speakers across both pods, guests excluded. +142.7pp shared bucket under BALANCED — $600K became $2.28M. The 'follow the people who show up every week' portfolio.

6 hosts · 195 calls (BALANCED filter) · 5 methodology presetsOpen →
Sohn Investment Conference (annual, NYC)● live

Sohn Scorecards

The hedge fund world's biggest annual pitch stage. Every public speaker's call, run through the standard engine, marked daily vs SPY. 1-year retrospective for closed years; live read for the current year. Cross-year repeat speakers surfaced.

2025 + 2026 covered · 33 pitches across 27 speakersOpen →
All-In Summit (annual, LA)● live

Summit Scorecards

Different from Sohn — Summit is a tech/founders/policy event where market commentary is incidental. Three-category framing: independent investor pitches (engine-scored), CEO own-book (curation signal), thematic frames (commentary). The CEO curation question is genuinely interesting and flips year over year.

2024 + 2025 covered · 32 pitches across 3 categoriesOpen →
Grant's Annual Fall Conference (NYC)● live

Grant's Scorecards

Jim Grant's annual gathering for the deflationary / value / activist short crowd. Different audience from Sohn — more bearish, more contrarian, more comfortable with explicit shorts. Every public-market pitch scored against SPY with the same engine.

2024 + 2025 covered · 10 pitches across 8 speakers (3 of 2025 scoreable via proxies, 5 unscoreable)Open →
Pivot (Kara Swisher + Scott Galloway)soon

Pivot Picks

Two-host dense business commentary, 8-year backlog. The cleanest second-pod candidate.

771 episodes catalogued, transcription pendingqueued for build
Acquired (Ben Gilbert + David Rosenthal)soon

Acquired Tastes

Long-form M&A deep dives. High signal density per episode. Bigger compute lift; smaller catalog.

213 episodes cataloguedqueued for build
Members of Congress + cabinet officialsroadmap

Hill Holdings

What they said on the pod. What they traded next. Cross-correlation with PunditPoorly appearances is the angle nobody else has.

Phase 1 spec drafted — ships after All-In v1roadmap

How it works

  1. Transcribe. Every episode of every covered show, end to end. Whisper-base on CPU, RSS-sourced audio.
  2. Score. Each financial-instrument mention gets scored on two dimensions: claim strength (how forcefully the view was stated) and specificity (how testable the call is). The combination drives position size and which conviction tier the call lands in. We surface a qualitative tier (HIGH / MID / LOW) on every receipt; the numeric weights are operational and not published.
  3. Ledger. Predictions flow into a deterministic engine (v5.4 SPY-as-cash + 5 user-selectable methodology presets via BYOB) that opens, sizes, holds, decays, and exits positions over time per the v2.3 rubric. Real prices via yfinance, real holidays, real next-open execution.
  4. Audit. Every record has a 🚩 button. Spot a wrong speaker, ticker, direction, sarcasm-missed? Flag it. Corrections get voted on, reviewed by mods, and applied with full edit history.

The methodology page has the full rubric, the anti-gaming rules, the inter-rater reliability targets, and the changelog. Everything is published, including the misses.

Nobody asked. We ledger anyway. Public commentary is fair-use editorial material. We never republish full transcripts — receipt-style quotes only. Aggregate numbers are mostly accurate; per-host attribution is our best read with a community correction layer. Read the methodology before you treat any number as actionable.